Contributions from
the Column
Monitor


UN Summit: saving what could be saved

UN summit press review

Commodity exporters enjoy high demand

UNCTAD: Happy times for commodity exporters

Taxing air travel to fund development

Japan to increase aid

Roads and development

Alternative health report for WHO reform

Women have higher crop yields

World Bank: inequality blocks development


10/2005
 

UN summit press review

Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

Whether out of malice or mere negligence, many have contributed to reducing the UN secretary-general’s ambitious reform agenda to tatters, producing a document that will at best have only a patchy impact on the organisation in future. One day, perhaps, those who were obstructive will regret the fact that no “big deal” was stuck between North and South on security, progress and human rights.


Süddeutsche Zeitung, Munich

It is not a terminal setback for the UN but it will take many years to resurrect the key reform proposals. And the world's poor – whom the UN anniversary should have helped most – do not have that time.


The Manila Times

It is only 35 pages long but the 2005 World Summit Outcome speaks volumes about the political and diplomatic push and pull that the United Nations is heir to. Sixty years on, power-plays among its members still prevent the world body from achieving the goals it had so boldly inscribed in its charter.


The Times of India, Bombay

Secretary-General Kofi Annan had proposed an agenda that seemed appropriate for a new century and for the UN in the 60th year of its existence, but that is now all but buried under a cacophony of self-assertion by member states. In short, it was business as usual, with entrenched interests of nations holding firm against the common interest.


Financial Times, London

It is the vocation of NGOs to be critical. But look closely at the summit communiqué and the cup is as half-full as it is half-empty. One weary diplomat was heard to remark that the outcome this week was not as good as it might have been, but better than it could have been. That will always be the UN’s epitaph.


Daily Nation, Nairobi

The gathering was billed as the largest-ever collection of world leaders. It looked more like the largest gathering of do-nothing. There were interesting speeches though. Some nations, including the United States, had gnawed bare UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s reform proposals. A headline posted on UNWire screamed: UN World Summit adopts landmark outcome document on draft on crucial issues. Landmarks are relative.
New York Times

The document offers little more than a fudge of feel-good phrases and pious wishes for future action that leave everyone off the hook from taking entirely practical actions that are needed right now. Every one of the more than 170 national leaders attending, starting with president Bush, should be embarrassed about letting this rare opportunity slip away.