Texts and Reports
- Development Policy and the Armed Forces - Speeches and Issues Notes
ECOWAS
Mission in Cote d' Ivoire:
Partnerships for Peace
Abdoulaye
Fall
Force Commander
United Nations Operation in Côte d'Ivoire (UNOCI), Côte
d'Ivoire
Allow me, first
of all, to express my gratitude to the German authorities and the leaders
of Capacity Building International, who kindly invited me to be involved
in this dialogue.
It is a special pleasure to me, as the former Force Commander of the
ECOWAS Mission in Cote d'Ivoire (ECOMICI), and now in my capacity as
the current Force Commander of the United Nations Operation in the same
country (UNOCI) to be given the opportunity to make a personal input
to the dialogue on the general topic that the Forum singled out for
this session.
Cote d'Ivoire constitutes,
certainly, a relevant case study on cooperation in security and crisis
prevention and management issues. The positive benefits of the partnerships
developed during the mission should be strengthened, and some of the
initiatives taken during the operation should be established in a formal
manner, with the objective to enhance the support provided to the military
component to meet up with its commitment.
1 From the first
achievements to the first challenges
1.1 The first achievements
A diplomatic success of ECOWAS was achieved with the signing on 17 October
2002 of the first cease-fire agreement. The French troops offered to
stand on a separation line between the warring parties.
Since that suspension of the military fights, the countless initiatives
that ECOWAS has carried out, have greatly contributed to the progress
of the peace process.
The multinational force mandated along the French forces, since its
first operational duty on March 29, 2003 to its merger into the United
Nations' operation on April 4, 2004, recorded significant achievements
including:
- A shift from
the monitoring of the cease fire line, to the control of the zone
of confidence, casting further away the spectre of direct confrontations;
- The restoration
of the broken dialogue between the belligerents parties, with as results:
- War prisoners released,
- A joint D.D.R implementation plan developed,
- And the use of heavy weaponry stopped.
In addition to
the fact that:
- Trade and humanitarian
corridors were opened;
- The impartial
forces' operations were expanded throughout the territory in the aim
of restoring confidence and assisting the regrouping of combatants;
- An important
civil-military activities programme including a priority fold in free
medical assistance to the populations;
- And securing
the close protection of the members of the government.
Such outstanding field outputs are the ample justifications of the
decision made, at a very early stage of the crisis, to couple the
military instrument and the political and diplomatic efforts which
were deployed on a regular basis.
Nevertheless, despite such achievements, it should be brought to notice
that, how relevant the option of the leadership of ECOWAS was, there
are still some major hindrances which recurrently undermine every
opportunity of the military component to reach the objectives that
are pursued, to an optimum level.
1.2 The first
challenges
To mobilize adequate resources and sustain a high level of operational
readiness within the troops who are deployed, so as to enable them to
fulfil their mandate with the greatest efficiency, this is the greatest
challenge of ECOWAS.
In current peace operations, where one of the chief concerns is to secure
the protection and safety of the populations, the point is no longer
to act as a passive interposition force, but to be proactive and resort,
if need be, to force, in order to deny any action that can jeopardize
the lives of human beings, or prevent the peace units from carrying
out their missions.
All told, the ultimate goal is to be able to meet the requirements for
an available force, endowed with sound pressure and deterrence capacities.
Unfortunately, exhaustion and even lack of relevant capabilities distinguish
most of African national armies. To such an extent that, a subregional
force is usually characterized by the following inherent weaknesses:
- Slow responsiveness
in troop mobilization,
- Inadequate
country owned equipment,
- Poor logistic
support facilities,
- Modest funding
resources.
Conscious of that,
African leaders made a turn to search for a cooperation policy that
led to the development of some partnerships. The case of Cote d'Ivoire
shows the opportunities that such a cooperation can bring about, and
the possibility to open at the same time some paths of solidarity to
strengthen African capabilities.
2 Cote d'Ivoire: an example of successful partnership at the service
of peace
21 Capacity strengthening in ECOWAS units
2.1.1 Logistic support
At the level of the peace force, Great Britain channelled its efforts
through Ghana; Belgium, supported Benin in adding up its efforts to
those of France, which conveyed its assistance via Niger, Senegal And
Togo. These five were the troops contributing countries in ECOMICI.
The United States made a contribution in strategic transportation (For
the induction and repatriation of the contingents), in facilitation
of the movement of personnel within the mission area (vehicles, communications
equipment) and in funding the 2/3 of the food requirements.
Those various lines
of partnerships which were implemented simultaneously to guarantee that
ECOWAS troops could receive a sound logistical Support, were buttressed
with a substantial financial effort that came from some donor countries
which, along France which was the main financial donor, could help satisfy
the financial requirements of the force.
2.1.2 Financial
contributions
The monthly budget of the force accounted for 1.3 million euros for
1,300 men. The financial cost for the 12 month of ECOMICI operations
(about 15 million euros ) could be obtained owing to a set of assistance
agreements, that provided for some inputs from France (lead donor),
which were topped up with contributions made by the United Kingdom,
The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Sweden, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain.
The above conventions, and the contribution pledged by the donor countries
were to some degree, a source of satisfaction. However, for future ECOWAS
peace operations, a more sustainable financial solution is to be found.
2.2 ECOWAS/European
Union cooperation
The European Union (EU) put in place some financial facilities so as
to contribute to the fulfilment of the objectives of ECOWAS whose achievements
can be viewed as landmarks.
The tentative financial replenishment programme of the 9th European
Development Fund (EDF) for 2003-2007 for the West African region, with
a portfolio of 235 million euros, made the projection that 10 million
euros would be allocated to the peace endeavours of ECOWAS as a whole.
Equally, some ad-hoc operations were carried out through the tentative
national programme of Cote d'Ivoire, to fund ECOMIC's action in Cote
d'Ivoire.
Within the field of scope of assistance to the negotiations on the economic
partnership agreement, between West Africa and the EU, which provides
a financial pipeline of 10 million euros; several projects intended
to strengthen the capacities of the special organs of ECOWAS will be
undertaken.
Due to the lengthy procedure to obtain the disbursement of the EDF Funds
a quick response mechanism has been established to allow the European
Union to respond quickly, efficiently, and in flexible manner to crisis
situations. In the case of the Ivorian crisis, funds were mobilized
through this mechanism in order to uphold the mediation efforts of ECOWAS
in late 2002, and to back up the international monitoring committee
established by Linas-Marcoussis Agreements.
Within the framework of the political dialogue, between EU and ECOWAS,
important recommendations were adopted for peace and security in the
sub-region. A certain number of guidelines on the peace process in Cote
d'Ivoire, and on the cooperation with the United Nations were also given.
2.3 UNITED NATIONS/ECOWAS
cooperation
In Cote d'Ivoire, the ongoing joint cooperative activities of ECOWAS
and the United Nations (UN) fall into the range of various areas of
interest:
2.3.1 Diplomatic
support
The legitimate international status of the operation of ECOWAS in Cote
d'Ivoire was enshrined by the support of the United Nations, who vested
upon the Security Council, through Resolution 1464, the global plan
of crisis settlement, as suggested in Linas Marcoussis Agreements. Resolution
1528 which is an extension of such legitimacy recommends that UNOCI
should uphold the government of reconciliation in harmony with ECOWAS
and other international partners.
2.3.2 Operational
backstopping
As regards the assistance which is provided for the troops in the field,
the formula of the so called "The Third Party", support was
adopted for the five ECOWAS troop contributing countries. Memorandums
of understanding were signed between each country and a strategic partner,
among Belgium, Great Britain and France.
These countries supported the efforts of the African ones to meet the
UN requirements, by making provision for the allocation and the maintenance
of some parts of the equipment that were needed by the various national
contingents, essentially, in the keys areas of mobility, communications
and individual equipment.
2.3.3 Joint development
The experience that has been gained in joint deployment is also a hallmark
in the cooperation of ECOWAS and the UN, translated by the engagement
of the United Nations Mission in Cote d'Ivoire (MINUCI) which was initiated
in compliance with Resolution 1479 along the ECOWAS Mission In Cote
D'Ivoire (ECOMICI).
Resolution 1528 is the unfailing evidence of the will of the UN to carry
on with such an indispensable cooperation. so, on the military level,
there are in the current operation, five contingents, issued from the
past ECOMICI, which make up the nucleus of UNOCI, and to which some
additional units came to be grafted progressively from, Morocco, Bangladesh,
Pakistan And France. The French forces of the Licorne operation, act
as a quick reaction force.
However, beyond the success of the United Nations operation in Cote
d'Ivoire, in which ECOWAS would be a major stakeholder, it clearly appears
that, some initiatives must be taken or strengthened, with a view to
make those various partnerships much more beneficial.
3 For a greater
stability in our forces' performance: avenues of thought
3.1 Control
Of The Operational Availability Of ECOWAS Stand-By Units
The process of force generation, would make a greater performance, if
ECOWAS could activate a control mechanism and check the operational
availability of such units.
3.2 Creation
of a strategic planning cell
Setting up a political-military entity in the executive secretariat
would be an undeniable positive contribution for the improvement of
the strategic planning and solution of the management of the military
and political problems that a peace keeping operation is unavoidably
confronted with.
3.3 Activation
of a standing force staff
Boosting the operational efficiency of the force would require, without
any doubt, that a standing force staff be put in place, and equipped
with modern means that would enable it to plan and be up to implement
every operation.
3.4 Settting
up a subregional logistic base
The recurrent challenge of supply the forces with equipment could find
a better solution from the improvement in the coordination of the RECAMP
and other assistance programmes, but also in the setting up of an ECOWAS
logistic base, where the most important equipment and material, made
available by different partners, could be stored and maintained for
quick deployment.
3.5 Educational, training acquisition and benefits in the harmonization
of standard operating procedures to be retained
The action that is undertaken at the level of national military academies
and peace keeping training centres should be reinforced as well as all
the efforts that will be made in order to harmonize the standard operating
procedures, should be further consolidated. Tactical studies and training
in Zambakro/Cote d'Ivoire (now in Koulikoro/Mali) operative ones in
Accra/Ghana and strategic ones in Abuja/Nigeria.
Such commendable
initiatives should also be completed with the provision of some specialized
trainings, mainly in intelligence and civil-military activities, in
the prospect of developing in the long run some Qualified Resource persons
who will be proficient enough to be involved in liaison and contact
cells and in civil-military coordination cells, meant to prepare and
facilitate a deployment in hostile environment.
3.6 Establishment
of a lasting financial system
ECOWAS should also develop some planning capacity, and identify all
the priority needs to manage and gear in a consistent manner efforts
of the donors that still have to be coordinated. The ultimate goal should
be to build a special peace keeping fund, whose objective would be to
sustain the forces deployed to fulfil mission as mandated by ECOWAS.
A battle group of the type that ECOWAS dispatches, which has a population
of 1500 men could operate on a financial portfolio of 15 million euros
every semester.
The special fund of the European, termed peace keeping facility, which
is taking the buck over the ad-hoc finances which were provided so far
from the national indicative programmes, could be tapped in the sub
region to cover the annual operating budget of at least two conventional
battle groups, an amount of 60 million euros.
May then the outputs
of this policy dialogue contribute to improve further the cooperation
facilities that exist already between ECOWAS, the Organization of the
United Nations and the European Union; with the prospect of achieving,
one of those community objectives of establishing a standing, efficient
regional force, capable to be displayed at reasonable notice and within
reasonable deadlines, and to be supported in an acceptable fashion throughout
its deployment.
|